Smarter Surface Treatment Investments Start With Lower Operating Costs
Purchase price is only the opening line of the invoice. Energy draw, service hours and downtime write the rest of it — for years, and often decades. Compare a Pekotek Non-Waste chamber with a conventional scraper-floor system below, then drop in your own numbers.
What Defines an Efficient Blasting System?
Before investing in a new system — or replacing an aging one — the real question isn’t only the purchase price. It’s long-term profitability. Ask yourself:
The answers determine whether a system becomes a long-term asset — or a long-term expense. Below are representative comparisons based on typical operational data. Every system is tailored to specific production requirements, but the trends remain remarkably consistent.
Enter Your Current System’s Figures
Fill in what you know about your existing (or planned alternative) chamber. Every chart below — and the summary at the end — updates automatically to show where Pekotek’s Non-Waste system stands in comparison.
Energy Consumption & Efficiency
Example chamber size: 12 × 6 × 5 m (360 m³), including ventilation, filtering, recycling, heat exchange and lighting. Pekotek’s Non-Waste design typically draws roughly 25 kW versus ~40 kW for a comparable conventional scraper-floor system.
Estimated Annual Energy Cost
5-Year Energy Cost
10-Year Energy Cost
📉 Typical Pekotek energy savings: roughly €30,000 after 5 years and €60,000 after 10 years versus a conventional system of similar size, at current industrial electricity prices.
Downtime, Maintenance & Lost Production
Maintenance is never just a service invoice — it’s also the value of production that stands still while a system is down. Pekotek’s Non-Waste design uses very few moving mechanical parts, which is what keeps service time (and lost output) so low.
Annual Service Time
Cost of Downtime — 5 Years
Cost of Downtime — 10 Years
📉 Typical Pekotek downtime savings: roughly €100,000 after 5 years and €200,000 after 10 years, assuming a downtime value of €1,000/hour.
Operational Expenses Over Time
Example: a 10 × 5 × 5 m blasting chamber (250 m³). Filters, wear parts and labor are the main recurring costs for a Non-Waste system; a scraper-floor system adds cross-conveyor, elevator and airlock wear parts on top.
5-Year Operating Cost (Energy + Downtime + Parts)
10-Year Operating Cost (Energy + Downtime + Parts)
Total Cost Comparison & Payback
Assuming a comparable initial purchase price for both system types (typical for European-built equipment of similar capacity, example: €300,000), the gap opens up entirely through operating costs.
10-Year Total Cost of Ownership
📊 Result: over 10 years, a Pekotek Non-Waste system can cost several hundred thousand euros less to own and operate than a conventional scraper-floor system of similar capacity — before counting any gains in production uptime.
Key Conclusions
- ✓ Considerably lower operating costs from Year 1
- ✓ Dramatically reduced downtime and maintenance
- ✓ Lower energy consumption and fewer moving parts
- ✓ Longer service life and improved production continuity
- ✓ Higher profitability over the entire lifecycle
Conventional scraper-floor systems are often replaced within 15–20 years. Pekotek Non-Waste systems commonly remain operational for 30 years or more — meaning the comparative savings shown above keep compounding long after a conventional system has reached the end of its life.
Example Summary — Pekotek vs. Your Entered System
Generated live from the figures you entered above. Adjust any field and this summary updates instantly.